Talk:List of Slavic studies journals
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of Slavic studies journals article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This is a stand-alone list that meets list notability criteria. Please only add items that meet the selection criteria established in the lead. |
There is an RfC regarding the standardization of journal lists names. Please comment at Talk:List of journals#RFC. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 01:41, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
Not a substitute for specific references and sources edit
I sometimes see users adding a link to this page in a "Further reading" section in unsourced articles. I'd just like to note: linking to this page or Bibliography of the history of the Early Slavs and Rus' or Bibliography of Russian history (1223–1613) is not a substitute for specific references and sources to support specific claims in specific articles. In other words, this does not avoid the editor's WP:BURDEN. It's also not to be casually thrown around as something the reading might be interested in if they run into a random article like Sviatoslav III of Vladimir or Yuri II of Vladimir. (So @TimothyBlue and anyone else who might be doing this, I know it's well meant, but please don't. Thank you.) Cheers, Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 13:41, 7 May 2023 (UTC)