Talk:List of New Zealand Test cricketers
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Bs1jac in topic Separate tables versus single list
 | This article is written in New Zealand English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, analyse, centre, fiord) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sort by surname edit
It's much more useful to be able to sort the list by surname than by first name. The way to do it is to use Template:Sortname if anybody can be bothered implementing this. Schwede66 19:08, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
- Great idea. I'll start to do this. Big job though. ShakyIsles (talk) 22:59, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Done. ShakyIsles (talk) 02:39, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
Separate tables versus single list edit
Is there any reason for this? Columns are sortable, but because the names are not in a single table, you cannot compare (for example) highest run scorers or leading wicket takers overall; only of players who debuted in a particular decade. It's pretty easy to bring everything into a single table, but I wondered if there were any reasons/advantages of keeping it in the current format? Bs1jac (talk) 09:59, 24 February 2016 (UTC)