Talk:List of Linux adopters

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Celebrities section? edit

Why does this exist? Individual celebrities seem largely irrelevant when compared to massive organizations, should it be deleted? Frogg220 (talk) 10:54, 10 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

It is relevant because it has been covered in third party publications and is therefore notable and also because, like it or not, people care what celebrities do. - Ahunt (talk) 13:25, 10 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
Because the Dalai Lama enjoys Linux Games. I challenge anyone to find a more notable fan of Linux games.
We can list him if we have a WP:RS. I am afraid a G+ post won't cut it, see WP:SPS. - Ahunt (talk) 22:27, 14 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Businesses edit

The list of businesses using Linux seems quite small. Either Linux is used much less than I thought or there are very many more businesses that could be added. Sam Tomato (talk) 02:57, 27 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

I am sure there are lots more, but many just don't write about it. We just need refs to add them. - Ahunt (talk) 11:43, 27 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Linux use in Romanian Govt. edit

I tried to find reliable sources for the following statements

  • RATB, the state-sponsored public transportation company in Bucharest uses a Linux distribution called "C90++ (Benny)" for the display panels inside its Mercedes-Benz Citaro buses.
  • ROMATSA, the Romanian Air Traffic Services Administration, uses Ubuntu in its flight simulators.

but I couldn't find any. They've been uncited since October 2014 and I couldn't find any other instances of Romania using Linux, so I removed the section. - Sunmist3 (talk) 17:06, 6 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Android edit

Android is Linux, right? Doesn't Android qualify for mention here? Sam Tomato (talk) 02:58, 27 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Sure, but it is not usually "adopted" as an operating system by an organization per se, but if you have refs showing it has been then it can be added. - Ahunt (talk) 11:41, 27 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
Depends what you mean by Linux. Most user use the word to mean Gnu/Linux, but some people are aware that it is just a kernel. Therefore the article title should be made more clear, is it Gnu/Linux adoption or Linux kernel adoption. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.29.164.180 (talk) 22:38, 18 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
No, we aren't going there! Read GNU/Linux naming controversy. The consensus is that we don't use the term "GNU/Linux" on Wikipedia as it is a minority and POV term. On Wikipedia Linux kernel refers to the kernel, while as per WP:COMMONNAME, Linux refers to any operating system that incorporates the Linux kernel. This article deals with organizations that run computer operating systems based on Linux. - Ahunt (talk) 22:49, 18 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 9 external links on List of Linux adopters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:45, 25 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

  - Ahunt (talk) 03:38, 26 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 6 external links on List of Linux adopters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:57, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Some are broken some are okay, but too much work to endless chase this stupid bot and fix all its mistakes. - Ahunt (talk) 15:05, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on List of Linux adopters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

 N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:12, 10 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

The failed archive linked to an unrelated page; the contents of the page must have changed over the years. If you go to 15 May 2006 on Wayback Machine, the article is properly archived. Sunmist3 (talk) 21:39, 6 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of Linux adopters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:07, 18 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on List of Linux adopters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:38, 26 December 2017 (UTC)Reply