This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Empire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Empire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British EmpireWikipedia:WikiProject British EmpireTemplate:WikiProject British EmpireBritish Empire articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Can we clarify what operation the article is talking about that was to be undertaken near Kiel but cancelled?--EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 16:54, 28 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
There seems to be some crucial words missing from this sentence about the 2nd Airborne Division: In the aftermath of Fortitude South, the notional 2nd Airborne Division, the notional United States 9th and 21st Airborne Divisions and the real United States 17th Airborne Divisions to depict an airborne threat to the Kiel-Bremen area in support of Operation Market Garden. Or at least I can't figure out what it's supposed to mean. Fornadan(t) 12:53, 5 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
So is there any information about the effectiveness of these deceptive formations? Seeing how after the war the Allies had unlimited access to German military records, this information ought to be available. If it has been discussed in the secondary literature -- or there are insightful anecdotes in the published primary sources -- incorporating that material would make this article more useful. -- llywrch (talk) 18:44, 12 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Llywrch: I noted that you commented while I was still in the process of overhauling the article into a list. I have added a background section that discusses, in part, what you were after. Largely the first draft at the moment, while I look at some other things. But hopefully, it goes towards addressing your concern.EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 01:53, 19 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
.svg)
