Talk:List of Book of Mormon translations

Tamil

Does anyone have a reference for the full translation of the BoM into Tamil? I have been unable to find any. I've seen the date often given as 2005, like in this table from Paul Gutjahr's The Book of Mormon: A Biography, which I've seen copied elsewhere on the web. And the page on Cumorah.com for Sri Lanka ambiguously says "The Book of Mormon is translated into Sinhalese and Tamil," without specifying whether it was selections or a full translation.

The best source I can find is the February 2005 Ensign, which lists the new Tamil translation as only selections. (Cumorah.com echoes this.) Selections had also been published in 1982, so perhaps this was a revision or replacement of those selections?

Here's a link to the BoM Tamil translation, if anyone is able to read it and tell whether it is a full translation or selections. ——Rich jj (talk) 13:29, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

I have compared my Tamil translation by books and ending chapters and verses of the English and other translations and each are the same. Therefore, it appears that the Tamil Book of Mormon published in 2005 is a complete copy of the Book of Mormon. Though I do not speak the language this appears to be the case. Book by book, chapter by chapter and verse by verse all the numbers are the same.CWMcBrayer (talk) 04:46, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on List of Book of Mormon translations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.lds.org/library/display/0,4945,40-1-3311-1,00.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090201131929/http://www.ldscatalog.com:80/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/CategoryDisplay?catalogId=10151 to http://www.ldscatalog.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/CategoryDisplay?catalogId=10151&storeId=10151&categoryId=13654&langId=-1&cg1=&cg2=&cg3=&cg4=&cg5=&pageId=1&pageCt=25&sortId=3&sortOr=2

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:43, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of Book of Mormon translations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120518103545/http://www.lds.org/bc/content/shared/content/russian/pdf/language-materials/34406_rus.pdf?lang=eng&clang=rus to https://www.lds.org/bc/content/shared/content/russian/pdf/language-materials/34406_rus.pdf?lang=eng&clang=rus
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.lds.org/library/display/0%2C4945%2C40-1-3311-1%2C00.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:15, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Esperanto translation

The Book of Mormon has been translated into Esperanto, but this work hasn't received an imprimatur from any of the churches.--86.170.21.102 (talk) 16:14, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Why has the Esperanto edition been deleted from this list? As the poster above points out, it is unofficial, but it does exist because I have an electronic copy of it! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.249.184.209 (talk) 11:59, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

I removed it from the "complete translations" list because I've only seen the "selected chapters" translation. If you have a complete translation I'd love to see it. You can e-mail me from the "e-mail this user" link on the left-hand sidebar from my userpage. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 16:10, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

I just saw that it was complete removed. I added it back. This title of this page is "List of Book of Mormon translations," not "List of Official Book of Mormon translations," so I believe it should stay. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 16:15, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Esperanto was removed because it is not officially accepted by any branch of the LDS tradition. For example, in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, translations must be approved by the First Presidency before becoming official. That has not happened for Esperanto. There is no information anywhere that the Community of Christ has made a similar translation. To claim Esperanto as a "Selections of the Book of Mormon," which is unique to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and must also be approved by the First Presidency, is wrong. I've moved information about Esperanto to the text of the page, but the language cannot be included in the list. Hydrobrain (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 15:05, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

It seems weird to have a sentence just for Esperanto in the lead. What about a section on unofficial translations? For example, I'm not sure if the 2015 Hebrew translation of the BoM is official in any church--it was independently published.Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 16:07, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

I've been doing more research on the Esperanto BoM translation. The selected chapters were approved, but not published by the church. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 22:11, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

"Esperanto was removed because it is not officially accepted by any branch of the LDS tradition." - This isn't an argument, sorry. This page is for translations of the BoM, not for whether they have received official approval by some church. We don't do the same on every Bible translation for example or Koran.

There are official groups that maintain certain translations of the Bible. Cambridge University Press maintains it for the King James Version of the Bible, the American and British Bible Societies maintain the Spanish Reina-Velera version, etc. Hydrobrain (talk)

The question here is not whether it is "officially accepted", but if it is complete, and written in competent Esperanto.-86.180.91.151 (talk) 09:38, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

The problem with Esperanto showing up in the lists already provided is that 1) it is not a complete translation, from what I've seen, and 2) it cannot be listed as a "Selections of the Book of Mormon," because that is a specific designation that means something specific: certain chapters are included, and it's accepted and published by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. The Esperanto translation is, at best, an unofficial, partial translation. If we want to include it on this page, it really should be part of a sub-list of unofficial translations, so that we do not imply an official translation that does not exist.Hydrobrain (talk)

According to my source, which you removed, the Esperanto translation was officially approved. Maybe a separate subsection would be better, since whether or not the church published a translation seems to be very important to you (though it is not demanded by the page's title). Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 16:00, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

I made a separate section for non-LDS translations. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 16:48, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Quechua

Book of Mormon - Quechua

The catalog record for this item says it's a translation of the BoM into the Quecha language from 1980. Is it actually just the selections? Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 16:37, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

There was a Selections translation completed in 1979 for Quechua (Peru) and a Quichua (Ecuador) Selections completed in 1980. Could be either of those Hydrobrain (talk)

Orphaned references in List of Book of Mormon translations

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of List of Book of Mormon translations's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "map":

• From Czech language: "Map of Czech Dialects". Český statistický úřad (Czech Statistical Office). 2003. Archived from the original on December 1, 2012. Retrieved July 26, 2014.
• From Cook Islands: "The World today" (PDF), Legal.un.org

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 11:44, 2 March 2022 (UTC)