Talk:Linux range of use
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Linux range of use article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | Text and/or other creative content from this version of Linux was copied or moved into Linux range of use with this edit on December 14, 2021. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Possible article renaming? edit
How about maybe renaming the article to "Linux uses" or "Linux usage"? To me, the current title isn't that bad, but it's somehow too long and possibly awkward. Just as a suggestion... Thoughts? -- Dsimic (talk) 13:33, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Agree. "Linux uses" is a good title. 117.223.154.208 (talk) 04:21, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
Merge back to Linux#Uses? edit
There's a lot of cruft on this page; and I'm not sure there's a need for a stand-alone page once that is removed. Power~enwiki (talk) 04:27, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned references in Linux range of use edit
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Linux range of use's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "auto":
- From Earth Simulator: CEIST, JAMSTEC. "EARTH SIMULATOR". www.jamstec.go.jp.
- From Linux: "From Earth to orbit with Linux and SpaceX | ZDNet". www.zdnet.com.
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 15:08, 14 December 2021 (UTC)