Talk:Ling Jihua

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria edit

thumb|left|px500|An image of Ling Gu's fatal crash which widely circulated on the Chinese internet. does not fail Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria No. 8. The image of his son's car crash, widely circulated in China, severely damaged his reputation and standing. User:Fred Bauder Talk 21:35, 25 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

From The Guardian "The party announced its investigation into the former aide, Ling Jihua, in December 2014. Ling had been demoted in September 2012 from a ministerial-level job, months after his son was killed in a road accident involving a luxury sports car."[1]

References

  1. ^ "Chinese court jails former presidential aide Ling Jihua for life". The Guardian. 4 July 2016.
The image does not "significantly increase readers' understanding" of the article subject; everything important to the reader's understanding is quite effectively conveyed by text alone. The article is not about the crash, or anyone involved in the crash. The article itself states that "Despite media censorship regarding the event, news of the crash was widely circulated in China. . . . The crash and subsequent suppression was said to have led to Ling Jihua's demotion"; the image itself is not given central importance. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 23:01, 25 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
The image was suppressed in China. That alone is significant enough to support its inclusion here. User:Fred Bauder Talk 00:26, 26 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
Being supressed or censored is not really a justification for non-free use, unless that supression, etc. is in and of itself something which has been discussed by independent reliable sources. There is nothing about any image suppression in the relevant section and the reader does not need to see a crash photo to understand that Ling Gu died in a car crash; if such discussion exists, then it should be added to the article with citations to reliable sources. Otherwise, Hullaballo Wolfowitz's removal of the image seems completely in accordance with Wikiepdia's non-free content use policy. The file may be nominated for discussion at WP:FFD if more feedback for the community is desired. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:46, 26 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
"The Beijing Evening News published an article and a photograph, but the topic was immediately scoured from the Internet." http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/05/world/asia/how-crash-cover-up-altered-chinas-succession.html User:Fred Bauder Talk 14:44, 26 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
The crash of a Ferrari Spider at high speed creates a rather notable image. User:Fred Bauder Talk 14:47, 26 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ling Jihua. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:58, 23 December 2017 (UTC)Reply