Talk:Linda Hirshman

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Promotional piece, not encyclopedia article edit

A Wikipedia article should not be a promotional piece. It should have a neutral point of view and it should avoid puffery. Assertions should be sourced. From the paragraph on her new book "Victory":

the most successful progressive social movement of the last four decades - Who says?

this admirable and amazing political triumph - Who says?

Rave reviews. - "Generally positive" would probably be OK, but "rave"?

I'm not an expert on Wikipedia editing, but if I were, I'd pepper this article with "citation needed" and "point of view" tags. Omc (talk) 13:19, 22 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

I agree. I have removed some of the promotional stuff and added a tag for better sources. More third-party sources are needed. It may still be too promotional. --Boson (talk) 21:12, 24 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Linda Hirshman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:32, 16 May 2017 (UTC)Reply