Talk:Linda Chavez-Thompson

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Redir tag info

edit

I wonder why liberalism is mentioned in that first tag. If the distinction is between her as a current unionist vs. a former unionist, shouldn't that be what's mentioned? Also, are any of the articles available online? It would be nice to visit them if possible. – Scartol · Talk 14:55, 17 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

That's because Linda Chavez, the former unionist (she used to be an AFT staff person), is now a very conservative Republican. She was nominated by Bush II to be Secretary of Labor. But the press found out that she employed an illegal immigrant as her housekeeper and hadn't paid income or SS taxes for her. She withdrew her nomination, very angrily. The "liberalism" tag was placed there by someone else, who clearly wanted to distinguish between the "liberal" and the "conservative" individuals. I agree, it could be NPOV.
I'm leery of linking to articles online. Most of the citations I used were found in libraries using reference texts, not online. The few which I was able to find online (like the NY Times articles) are pay-to-view. That's the problem with most newspaper articles: Newspapers very quickly (usually within 10-14 days) put them in a pay-to-view area, which makes linking to them useless. - Tim1965 18:24, 17 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, that's fair. Now that I think of it, most of the articles I've used lately are through library databases, which most folks can't access directly. I withdraw my question. (Remember that last line, from The Simpsons?) – Scartol · Talk 21:48, 17 September 2007 (UTC)Reply


retirement?

edit

Should the fact of her running for lt. gov in 2010 be under political work rather than retirement? Bshirley (talk) 16:00, 4 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Linda Chavez-Thompson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:02, 16 May 2017 (UTC)Reply