Talk:Lexus RC

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Top Gear edit

A section was added covering Top Gear's highly critical review of the RC. Top Gear has a reputation of "reviewing" cars in such a manner aimed at getting more viewers watching their comedy show rather than a true presentation of what the car is. In this case they have taken the fact that it has copied some of the LFA styling and have then set out to prove that it doesn't drive like a real LFA. Sheesh, we all know that it won't drive like that. We all know that it is still a Lexus IS underneath. Clarkson doesn't even bother to let the Stig try it and denies it any chance to show what it can or cannot do in a fair test. Any other true reviewing program would test it and then compare the data. Top Gear has decided how it is allowed to be tested and therefore Top Gear has become untrustworthy and unreliable as a source of car reviews.  Stepho  talk  01:03, 27 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

I agree that the Top Gear review is inappropriate for this article. OSX (talkcontributions) 02:53, 27 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lexus RC. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:08, 22 December 2017 (UTC)Reply