Talk:Leszek, Duke of Masovia

B-class review

Passed for WP:POLAND. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:47, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Leszek, Duke of Masovia/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Iazyges (talk · contribs) 16:27, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Will start soon. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 16:27, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Criteria

GA Criteria
GA Criteria: 1 1.a Y 1.b Y 2 2.a Y 2.b Y 2.c Y 2.d Y (4.8% is highest) 3 3.a Y 3.b Y 4 4.a Y 5 5.a Y 6 6.a Y 6.b Y

• No DAB links Y
• No Dead links Y
• Images appropriately licensed Y

Prose Suggestions

• Older Polish historians, like Oswald Balzer, named him Leszko, which is now considered as incorrect. suggest you change this to Older Polish historians, like Oswald Balzer, named him Leszko, a name which is considered incorrect by modern historians.
• Historian Józef Mitkowski stated that Leszek was named thanks to the courtly tradition preserved by Gallus Anonymus in his Cronicae Polonorum, suggest Historian Józef Mitkowski stated that Leszek was named due to the courtly tradition preserved by Gallus Anonymus in his Cronicae Polonorum,
• In the past historians were unsure which wife of Bolesław IV the Curly was the mother of Leszek: suggest In the past, historians were uncertain as to which wife of Bolesław IV the Curley mothered Leszek:
• Borys Paszkiewicz considered that date of birth written by Długosz could be right suggest Borys Paszkiewicz stated that date of birth given by Długosz may be correct
• @Swetoniusz: That is all my suggestions, passing now. -- Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 19:51, 27 February 2018 (UTC)