Talk:Lemuridae

Primates High‑importance

	Primates portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Primates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Primates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PrimatesWikipedia:WikiProject PrimatesTemplate:WikiProject PrimatesPrimate articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Africa: Madagascar Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Madagascar portal This article is supported by WikiProject Madagascar (assessed as Mid-importance).

Mammals Mid‑importance

	Mammals portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

February 2004 edit

Well it depends who we are. It is the standard for how we do things on the NL wikipedia. Consider; what is the point of the box OTHER that to provide a context. The body is where you want to tell ABOUT your subject. With Lemurs, the genus belongs with the family therefore in the body of the text. GerardM 14:08, 25 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Added reference about hybridization in Eulemur edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

It seems to me that this is an interesting thing to note about lemurs in general, so I put the reference under Lemuridae, but it could just as easily (or as a duplicate) on under True lemur. Hmmm, it just occurred to me that the best way to do it might be to put a general statement in Lemuridae and the specific reference in True lemur. What do you think? - Longtrekhome 13:35, 3 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Factual Problem edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Um, just a thought (and trying to help, because I like Wiki, but it gets a bad rap for this sorta thing) - it is highly unlikely that any Ancient Roman ever set foot on Madagascar in order to name a Lemur. I don't think there needs to be a citation on this statement, I think it probably needs to be removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.27.175.223 (talk) 03:21, 22 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic