Talk:Lebensreform
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lebensreform article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
.svg){kind=small} | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Speculation edit
There is no room for speculation in Wikipedia. Therefore the statement that "Speculation is that such rightwing projects may be attempts to revive the Nazi-era Artaman League, to soften the image of the NPD, or to pull supporters away from the leftwing Alliance '90/The Greens (Green Party) of Germany" should be removed. In addition, the speculation is illogical - the Lebensreform is in no way a revival of the Artaman League, the expression "soften the image of the NPD" is meaningless or at best derogatory and POV, and the reference to pulling supporters from the Greens is illogical - even though there is often little difference between far left and far right.203.80.61.102 (talk) 22:54, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
I support this opinion! --Tiki (talk) 12:22, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
This particular part of the article makes the whole piece look like some bad bit of yellow press writing. It is not quite what one would expect in an encyclopedia. And it has no relevance to the topic at hand, or to the rest of the article. It smacks of personal vegeance or some other personal vendetta. Which again, is neither factual nor befitting to an article in an encyclipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.22.254.130 (talk) 23:01, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
The disputed text is unsourced and so it will be removed. Andrew🐉(talk) 21:43, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Lebensreform. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100924180439/http://hippy.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=243 to http://hippy.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=243
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100103172022/http://www.frieze.com/issue/article/nature_boy/ to http://www.frieze.com/issue/article/nature_boy/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:55, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
Right wing ?? edit
Please define your version of 'right wing' National - Socialist are Not Right wing! Fascism is not a conservative movement. Fascism is Fascistic. Stop the disinformation. 2600:1000:B101:25CE:8AF:B9E:ED9E:BAB8 (talk) 14:32, 20 December 2021 (UTC)