Talk:Lebanese loop

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Operation edit

I don't really get how this works. How can the loop be retrievable to the criminal, yet unnoticeable to the victim? Mwv2 (talk) 07:05, 5 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

The device can include a fascia which fits over the slot, or be made of dark-coloured tape and stuck just inside the existing slot. You'd see it if you were looking for it, but wouldn't notice it otherwise. I've added some diagrams and detail to the article. --McGeddon (talk) 09:25, 29 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

References edit

Most of the references are dead links, i.e. expired or pointing to nowhere. keldonin (talk) 11:26, 8 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Lebanese loop. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:41, 25 May 2017 (UTC)Reply