This article needs attention...Etbebl (talk) 21:41, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
- i agree --DerekvG (talk) 13:29, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
- To be specific, I don't know what the second paragraph under the second section is saying, and there's also some grammatical stuff. Lythronaxargestes (talk) 01:27, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
- Update: I've reworked the article quite a bit, but it is still quite vague. Additional citations and clarifications are needed. Lythronaxargestes (talk) 01:47, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Proposed merge edit
I propose to merge Laypeople here, since it is merely the plural of "lay person" and all the links on the list are merely kinds of lay person. bd2412 T 01:35, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
- Support - There's no point in having a separate article for the plural version. However, Laypeople is acting as a disambiguation page for the various versions of laypeople. I suggest that the resulting Lay person (or Layperson) article should also be marked as a dab page. I worked through the list from the March Dabchallenge and found a majority of the links should be changed to Laity rather than Layperson. PKT(alk) 15:47, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment. See also WP:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015_February_15#Layman, where I first mentioned inconsistencies with various "lay man" redirects. Si Trew (talk) 06:06, 28 May 2015 (UTC)