Talk:Lauren Holiday/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 16:00, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I will be reviewing this against the GA criteria as part of a GAN sweep. I'll leave some comments soon. JAGUAR  16:00, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against the GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   The lead summarises the article but consider merging it into two paragraphs

   "She earned U.S. Soccer Female Athlete of the Year honors in 2014" - this has already been linked in the lead

   " In 2010, Holiday was the second-leading scorer on the team with seven goals in 13 total matches, starting seven" - starting at seven

   "In 2015, Holiday scored the third goal of the 2015 FIFA Women's World Cup Final in the 14th minute of the game" - is there an exact date for this? Or month?

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   No original research found.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

This should be good to go. It is well written, comprehensive and all of the sources check out too. JAGUAR  16:28, 2 December 2016 (UTC)