Talk:Language-oriented programming
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Language-oriented programming article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
5 examples of computer programming language?
is this any different from Grammar-oriented_programming? Bayle Shanks (talk) 07:55, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
More to the point - doesn't this *at least* go back to Kernighan & Plauger's "software tools"?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.73.254.218 (talk) 21:02, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
If 121.73.254.218 could be more specific about what in K&P's "Software Tools" book relates to this article I'll look into it. The description of this book on Amazon gives no indication of a link. David D Allen (talk) 18:39, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
Language-oriented programming does appear to be related to, or the same as Grammar-oriented_programming. I'm researching the literature on this topic and related, I'll look into it. David D Allen (talk) 18:39, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
Prolog edit
I am missing prolog in this category. Actually prolog modules like clpfd, chr and dcg can be seen as syntax extensions and they are mixable which is very strong. It is even mixable with a bigger language project namely logtalk which is also a language on top of prolog. I am not 100% sure but I think the racket languages cannot bi mixed so easily. I wish someone can prove me wrong. 95.91.243.156 (talk) 21:32, 7 September 2022 (UTC)