Talk:Land of Black Gold

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Midnightblueowl in topic GA Review

Fair use rationale for Image:Tintin Land of Black Gold in La Voix de l Ouest.jpg edit

 

Image:Tintin Land of Black Gold in La Voix de l Ouest.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 16:54, 24 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

English puns edit

Would anyone know what the English puns correspond to in the original French version? 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 12:25, 3 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

It looks like a Spitfire edit

The British fighter from the 1950 edition. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.8.98.118 (talk) 11:22, 18 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Coeurs Vaillants edit

Is the version of story published in Coeurs Vaillants the same, unfinished black and white version that was stopped because of WW2? This is the impression I get, but did they really publish the unfinished story or was it finished? --Oddeivind (talk) 18:19, 14 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Land of Black Gold/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ssven2 (talk · contribs) 05:59, 25 June 2015 (UTC)Reply


I will review this article. Thank you. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 05:59, 25 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Comments edit

  • "It then began serialisation in France in the magazine Coeurs Vaillants-Ames Vaillants from 4 August 1940, but after an interruption continued in Message Aux Couers Caillants in June 1945." — Doesn't make sense.
    • I've changed this to the following: "After being published in Belgium, the story began serialisation in neighbouring France; initially appearing in the magazine Coeurs Vaillants-Âmes Vaillants from 4 August 1940, the story was ultimately interrupted, and would only recommence in June 1945, this time in the magazine Message Aux Couers Caillants." Midnightblueowl (talk) 16:43, 25 June 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • wikilink "eczema".
  • "worklaod" — typo.  
    • That's weird; I thought that I'd already corrected that one. No matter - I've corrected it now! Midnightblueowl (talk) 16:35, 25 June 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • Assouline's review can be added in the "Critical Analysis" section as well.
    • Looking through Assouline's biography, he really offers very little in the way of critical commentary on Land of Black Gold but I have included what I can; a brief comment on the inclusion of Haddock into the adventure. Midnightblueowl (talk) 16:53, 25 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Midnightblueowl: That's all from me. Another great read, Midnightblueowl. Address the comments whilst providing explanations and the article is passed. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 08:58, 25 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:  
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:  
    B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:  
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:  
  7. Overall: Passed, my queries were met and solved by the nominator.
    Pass or Fail:  

@Midnightblueowl: Congratulations! The article is passed.  Ssven2 Speak 2 me 17:29, 25 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thank you Ssven2! Midnightblueowl (talk) 17:37, 25 June 2015 (UTC)Reply