Talk:Ladytron

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.amazon.com/Ladytron/e/B000APIJ1C. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Minimac (talk) 08:37, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

In further detail, the copyrighted content was added here by Redbirdmgmt. Minimac (talk) 08:37, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Untitled

Are we sure International Dateline was released in 2005? I'm a pretty devoted fan and I certainly didn't notice. At present, it's being advertised as a forthcoming, strictly limited edition single, which will be available by pre-order only (and the pre-orders are not yet being accepted). Thus, the 2005 date seems rather premature - do we have a source? Magicalsushi 12:45, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Also, I just noticed this on eBay (the link will expire at some point). Cracked LCD Live 7" single, b/w USA vs White Noise Live, catalogue number EMN39-7, 1000 copies worldwide. I don't know where that fits in chronologically, or in which territories it was released, but there's a photo of the picture sleeve so clearly it does exist. It ought to be in the list of singles, but I don't know where it should be inserted. Magicalsushi 13:41, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

I can't find the International Dateline or Weekend singles on the official site news or discography pages. Extended Play is a 2 disc EP - North America only. We need to identify "proper" releases from unofficial releases, promos, Japan only etc. Ebay is a particularly unreliable source of information - I think we should take the official site as authoritive to be honest. Secretlondon 17:55, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

Anyone else think it'd be a good idea (in general, not just for Ladytron) to differentiate between the different formats of albums/eps/singles, as they often contain different tracklistings and sometimes completely different versions of songs? Not to mention remixes etc.

• Also, Helen Marnie redirecting to Ladytron seems rather pointless, unless it's done for Daniel and Reuben too.

Sorted his out, but I do not have any source information.--Bulleid Pacific 20:25, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Background Information, genre

Is it really a good idea to make it say Rock as one of the genres for Ladytron? I don't think Ladytron is rock at all. Electropop is good, if you need to fill it up, perhaps other genres like electronic, electronica, electroclash (subjective), electro, etc. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by M1xmast3r (talk • contribs) 23:54, 16 January 2007 (UTC).

pic

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ladytron2009.jpg IMO, this picture is too dark to show anything.. might as well just remove it —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.186.9.228 (talk) 00:44, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Ladytron and Korg

I changed the part about the synthesizer names. I think it's easier to understand why they name them. My source was this article. Perhaps a more skilled user would add it to the main article's external links? It's fairly interesting stuff about their choice of equipment. Reslo79 05:37, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:LadytronMissBlack.jpg

Image:LadytronMissBlack.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:07, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Witching Hour.jpg

Image:Witching Hour.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 12:03, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Members of band?

Who are the members of the band and how come NONE of them are mentioned on the main page of the article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.68.216.199 (talk) 20:05, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Removed Pop Levi from "previous members", as this isn't true; he was never a member of the band, only a session musician in 2003, and there have been many others. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.41.36.90 (talk) 08:01, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

official external links

Someone is repeatedly posting a link to an unofficial site which has a related messageboard. It shouldn't be in there and should be considered vandalism if it continues. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Goblin12 (talk • contribs) 12:36, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

How about adding a section for Unofficial External Links? The Ladytron Unofficial forum is a great place for fans to discuss the band and the only message forum for them on the net I know of. Or are only officially sanctioned sites allowed on Wikipedia? --Zoltar42 (talk) 16:13, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:External links explains why sections like this do not exist in Wikipedia articles. More specifically, fan forums are excluded on the reasons 10. & 11. given in WP:ELNO and in this case possibly also 4., because of the possible conflict of interests. Quibik (talk) 17:53, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

accuracy

please do not undo factual edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.192.227.171 (talk) 00:06, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Music genre

What do you think are the most accurate tags to describe the Ladytron's music style? I suggest these genres: Electronic, Electropop, New Wave. Anyway they are not electroclash (read more here). Deepblue1 (talk) 19:02, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Similiarity

I think they sounds similiar to Dubstar, also english band which is well known worldwide. Its worth mentioning. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.205.132.228 (talk) 12:46, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

• Not quite similar. Anyway Sarah Blackwood (the Dubstar vocalist) was also the vocalist of the electropop band Client. This band is more similar to Ladytron than Dubstar. Deepblue1 (talk) 13:20, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Ladytron. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.ladytron.com/textsite/news.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:17, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ladytron. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140909235918/http://www.liv.ac.uk/media/livacuk/insight/Insightautumn06.pdf to http://www.liv.ac.uk/media/livacuk/insight/Insightautumn06.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110303011146/http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/showbiz/music-news/2008/06/01/60-second-interview-ladytron-s-mira-aroyo-78057-20591556/ to http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/showbiz/music-news/2008/06/01/60-second-interview-ladytron-s-mira-aroyo-78057-20591556/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:35, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ladytron. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://uk.linkedin.com/in/reubenwu
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100102035202/http://korg.com/Artist.aspx?artist=259 to http://www.korg.com/Artist.aspx?artist=259

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:20, 25 May 2017 (UTC)