Talk:Lacey Chabert

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Bosd939 in topic New picture

Two questions regarding filmography edit

1. Chabert is credited as co-executive producer of her latest Hallmark TV movie, Wish for Christmas. Would that be listed in the notes column of the filmography table? 2. Why are some of Chabert's TV movies listed in the main Filmography table, but not others? Thanks. --Sephiroth9611 (talk) 16:28, 31 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lacey Chabert. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:37, 10 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

No encyclopedic need for full name and date of birth of Chabert's child edit

I believe it is inappropriate for Wikipedia to include the name and exact birthdate of Chabert's daughter, per WP:BLPNAME. This child's full name and birthday are in no way essential to an encyclopedic understanding of Chabert's career, and are exactly the information an identity thief or other criminal would use to engage in bad acts victimizing a non-notable child. The only apparent interest in including the information seems to arise from a popular fascination with celebrities' children's names and/or certain minutiae-focused fans wanting to know every detail of their favorite celebrities' lives. While I recognize that this information can be tracked down through celebrity and gossip magazines, Wikipedia shouldn't be involved in perpetuating this type of privacy violation that provides no benefit to encyclopedic coverage of Chabert's career and runs the risk of victimizing a helpless minor. The fact that she has a daughter born in September 2015 provides all the information an encyclopedia article should require with respect to Chabert's life. If there is a compelling argument to the contrary (other than "I'm a fan and fans want to know everything about her"—if that's the rationale, take it to a fansite, not Wikipedia), this is the place to make it. - Julietdeltalima (talk) 18:14, 20 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lacey Chabert. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:28, 11 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

New picture edit

Can we get a new picture added. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bosd939 (talkcontribs) 02:41, 12 February 2021 (UTC)Reply