Talk:Lacaille 8760
Latest comment: 14 years ago by CrackDragon in topic Largest and Brightest Red Dwarf known?!
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
AX Microscopium? edit
Shouldn't that be "AX Microscopii" (using the genitive plural of the constellation's name)?
Infobox Luminosity is wrong edit
According to luminosity
When not qualified, luminosity means bolometric luminosity
but the value 0.028 is obviously derived from the absolute visual magnitude, and is therefore not bolometric. Qemist (talk) 12:05, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
Largest and Brightest Red Dwarf known?! edit
Since HIP 12961 has a mass of 0.63 solar masses, a radius 0.68 ± 0.03 of the Sun, an absolute magnitude of +7.8 and is of spectral type M0, then it's obviously a more powerful star than Lacaille 8760. CrackDragon (talk) 09:26, 28 April 2010 (UTC)