Talk:Laberia gens

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

About the two CC. Laberii Prisci edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

It is suspicious that two men who were consuls so close together in time should have the same identical name. I double-checked the sources, & the existence of the second Laberius Priscus (cos. 150) is based on the restoration of the names of a pair of consuls in one of the Acta Arvalia, which reads [...]mus, C. La[...]. While other records make it certain that this does not refer to the pair of consuls of 142, it is possible that C. La[...] was a suffect consul with a different gentilicum. Because this is the restoration supported by the consensus of experts, it will remain so until more evidence is found. Nevertheless, some note of that this might be a bad restoration needs to be made, & IMHO here on the Talk page is sufficient for the moment. -- llywrch (talk) 16:47, 10 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic