- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 16:07, 31 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Lakeith Stanfield → LaKeith Stanfield – To accord capitalization with rest of article, IMDb, Netflix, Rotten Tomatoes, Yahoo & subject's own social media accounts. I can't make the move, as the target title already exists as a redirect to the current article. Ekaterina Colclough (talk) 19:45, 17 August 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. – robertsky (talk) 15:37, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
- This is a contested technical request (permalink). GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 04:11, 18 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
- The references are not consistent in the capitalization. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 20:46, 17 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
- That's as may be. The article should display internal consistency, and right now it does - with the exception of the title. —Ekaterina Colclough (talk) 22:41, 17 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Support. Plenty of entertainment outlets (Variety, GQ, EQ, Daily Mail) use LaKeith. Some reputable sources (NY Times in 2018, Guardian in 2021) use Lakeith though. Also question are there other Wiki articles where the subject has a similar capitalization? Fredlesaltique (talk) 14:41, 19 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
- Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 22:08, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
- Support while many sources may have the k lowercase, I see that most reliable sources (including subject's social media and film credits) use the capitalization.Yeoutie (talk) 22:46, 25 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
