L. J. Peak was nominated as a Sports and recreation good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (March 22, 2024, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from L. J. Peak appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 July 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
GA Review edit
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:L. J. Peak/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: TonyTheTiger (talk · contribs)
Reviewer: Premeditated Chaos (talk · contribs) 23:07, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
This nomination was made as part of a mass nomination in order to obtain WikiCup points and it shows. The lead fails to summarize the article - nothing past 2015 is mentioned. Most of the article is weighted to high school and college, with any mention of his pro career limited to 217 words (and that counts section headers). Even worse, most of those 217 words are for his 2017 season. Everything since 2018 is simply repetitive proseline: "He signed with X. He signed with X. He signed with X." Did he actually set foot onto the court at any point since 2018? If he did, how did he perform? Who knows? Not the nominator, apparently. If I sound pissed off here, it's because I am. Writing this review was a waste of my time. It should never have been nominated; it's far from the GACR and the nominator has enough tenure to have known that. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:07, 22 March 2024 (UTC)