Talk:Kristen Iversen

Age?

Who has a Wikipedia article with no date of birth? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:644:8403:1CC0:2D78:D404:BA51:F694 (talk) 14:52, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Untitled

This entire page looks like it was recently posted in promotional support of Ms. Iversen's new book. The entire copy (text) comes directly and nearly word for word from press releases and the blurb's on the book's dust jacket. Although I don't see anything false, the source leaves me wondering about how balanced and appropriate this is for Wikipedia. 216.243.176.75 (talk) 00:55, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Although it may be pretty much a copy/paste from press releases, I guess it's better than nothing. She's a newer author, so there's not bound to be too much info on her. However, if someone wants to rephrase the article, I encourage him/her. 208.22.79.249 (talk) 15:09, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

No, it's not better than nothing. Allowing people to use Wikipedia for promotional purposes is an embarrassment to what Wikipedia is supposed to be about. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.130.43.201 (talk) 06:34, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

As the creator of this article, I can assure you I have no connection with the subject. I don't know her and I haven't even read any of her books. But she is an award winning author and more than satisfies the general notability guidelines. There are now plenty of independent sources for the article, including the NY Times, NPR and the Guardian. Harry the Dog WOOF 10:43, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Kristen in Jeep (5).jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Kristen in Jeep (5).jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:43, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Kristen Iversen/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Dr. Iversen's name is misspelled in the title. It is Kristen, not Kirsten. Kalkiwendy (talk) 05:05, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Last edited at 15:24, 16 February 2010 (UTC). Substituted at 21:24, 29 April 2016 (UTC)