Talk:Klez

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computer Security.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

I removed the following text from this article:

Microsoft will never send an executable over the Internet without your specific instruction and therefore knowledge. It is bad practice for a technical support representative to send you an executable without somehow ensuring that you can't accidentally execute the code without getting in touch with him/her for further instructions.

This seems like opinion text and it doesn't add to the strength of the (otherwise fine) article.

Additionally, this was left in as a commented-out piece of text in this article:

<!-- It's apparently not "going strong" any longer, is there any evidence for it prevaling longer than usual?
Unlike previous worms such as Sircam, which were quickly squelched, Klez is still going strong. -->

It probably best belongs here, too. 64.16.181.63 02:21, 7 May 2005 (UTC)Reply