Talk:Kite control systems

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

One Single Power Kite Article? edit

Should the content of this page be moved onto the power kite page? I cannot really see why the two are separate. I also wonder whether the kite related pages about LEI's, foil kites etc. should be integrated into this one. If it's too vast, a single page is clearly not good. But if things are spread out too much, the reader will have a hard time trying to stay focussed. Opinions?

misterb, 29 Sept 2005

I agree. It seems counter intuitive to have to follow links to all these seperate pages. The casual reader will be looking for a concise overview on Power Kites - as was I on first visit. The subject is hardly extensive at present (well at least the basics) - so surely a single page would suffice and provide a good overview.


my vote is for this separate kite control page to continue, as many non-power control applications are covered. dave santos 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.118.1.77 (talk) 17:05, 2 July 2008 (UTC)Reply


My vote is that the two pages should be merged. JacobLynnFlemming (talk) 13:06, 11 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kite control systems. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:45, 11 December 2017 (UTC)Reply