 | Kings Plaza has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: September 28, 2019. (Reviewed version). |
 | A fact from Kings Plaza appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 October 2019 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 01:19, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
( )
- ... that New York City's Kings Plaza shopping mall was built with a marina for visitors, as well as its own power system? Source: Brooklyn Daily 1, Brooklyn Daily 2
- ALT1:... that unaccompanied teenagers were temporarily banned from New York City's Kings Plaza shopping mall in 2013? Source: CBS news
Improved to Good Article status by Epicgenius (talk) and Tdorante10 (talk). Nominated by Epicgenius (talk) at 03:33, 28 September 2019 (UTC).
@Epicgenius: Another very well researched NYC article! Recent GA, long enough, well referenced, and no obvious close paraphrasing from Earwig or a spot-check of non-text sources. For the first hook, the URL for the reference supporting the power system ([1]) appears to be dead; can you replace it? For the second hook, I think it would be more accurate to say "unaccompanied teenagers" for accuracy as reflected in the article and the source. Also waiting on a QPQ. 97198 (talk) 09:15, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
- @97198: Thanks for the review. For the first hook I revised the sources to use the source PDF directly, rather than a viewer, which was causing the dead links. For the second hook I added unaccompanied teenagers. epicgenius (talk) 14:10, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
- This link (reference 13 in the article, and linked above) is still dead for me. 97198 (talk) 14:50, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
- @97198: I don't know why but the correct URL uses the word "and" in place of the symbol "&" which is used in the dead URL. It is fixed now. epicgenius (talk) 15:03, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
