Talk:King's Newnham

Untitled

Note 1 is a dead link... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.108.210.118 (talk) 17:32, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

It is more than a hamlet if it has a civil parish, yes?

Generally an (active?) church makes a village. Certainly is a current unit of government so why not call that sufficient to make it a village, who uses the term hamlet to pinpoint where they are so can avoid it anyway?Adam37 (talk) 21:26, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on King's Newnham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928002111/http://www.warwickshire.gov.uk/corporate/parishtown.nsf/0/ad505ab6332267e38025655a004002cd?OpenDocument to http://www.warwickshire.gov.uk/corporate/parishtown.nsf/0/ad505ab6332267e38025655a004002cd?OpenDocument

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:45, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on King's Newnham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060601120520/http://www.churchlawford.org.uk/history/kingsnewnham/tower.shtml to http://www.churchlawford.org.uk/history/kingsnewnham/tower.shtml
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050216021833/http://www.bmsgh.org/parish/warw/tyaiw/lawfordm.html to http://www.bmsgh.org/parish/warw/tyaiw/lawfordm.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:52, 10 December 2017 (UTC)