Talk:Killer yeast

Fungi Mid‑importance

	Fungi portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fungi, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fungi on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FungiWikipedia:WikiProject FungiTemplate:WikiProject FungiFungi articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Microbiology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microbiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microbiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrobiologyWikipedia:WikiProject MicrobiologyTemplate:WikiProject MicrobiologyMicrobiology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

First observed edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The citation intended to support the statement "The phenomenon was first observed by Louis Pasteur, as noted in 1877" does not seem to be about killer yeasts; instead it's about anthrax. Was this citation used by mistake? Or perhaps the discussion about anthrax is relevant to killer yeasts in a way I didn't understand? As far as I can tell, the first mention of killer yeasts in the literature is a pair of abstracts by Makower and Bevan from 1963 (Bevan EA, Makower, M 1963. The physiological basis of the killer character in yeast. Proc. 11th int. Congr. Genet. I , 203; Makower M, Bevan EA. 1963. The inheritance of a killer character in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae). Proceedings of the 11th International Congress of Genetics 1 : 202). Does the person who included the Pasteur citation know something more? MicrobeFun (talk) 15:33, 16 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

The statement was added by @Fasquelle: in in January 2010. he added information about the 1963 discovery a day earlier. I don't have access to the references any more and can't verify anything.-gadfium 23:45, 16 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

two viruses not one edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The toxin actually comes from a second virus involved (Saccharomyces cerevisiae killer virus M1 (ScV-M1)), see https://academic.oup.com/femsre/article/26/3/257/497293. --SCIdude (talk) 07:49, 16 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic