Talk:Khurnak Fort

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

India: Jammu and Kashmir Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Jammu and Kashmir (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article was last assessed in January 2020.

This page should not be speedy deleted because... edit

This page should not be speedily deleted because the information on this topic is virtually nonexistent on internet sources

Indian post? edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

The article claims that India had a post at the Khurnak Fort prior to 1958. The citation 8 given in the current version is incomplete and the source is in French. If this is in fact true, there must be sources in English as well? Does anybody know? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 13:36, 18 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

The claim was added by an IP here. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 13:40, 18 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Afaik, there was one. Will check my sources, this weekend. TrangaBellam (talk) 15:42, 18 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

The source cited was this Peking document. I have the English version of it. But it has no mention of Khurnak anywhere. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 23:21, 19 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic