Talk:Kheibar Shekan
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:07, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- The entire article should be deleted. It is obviously a bit of propaganda by Iran. A sales pitch. 24.237.2.174 (talk) 06:57, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:06, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:07, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
Is this article an Iranian Propaganda piece? edit
The article is so overly full of praise for advanced technologies, performance, precision, impact, abilities, manoevribility, ingenuitiy, perfection and so on that one would think this would be the most advanced missile in the whole wide world. Seems less than plausible. 46.114.5.196 (talk) 00:45, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- agree 84.95.135.210 (talk) 20:46, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, it's a brochure, not an article. The author Championmin (who seemingly usually writes about Iranian philosophy and celebrities) is cleary not well-versed in engineering (e.g. wrong use of words like "optimal") and the English is a bit off at times... 2001:9E8:A561:1D00:2287:E681:98D6:C7E1 (talk) 22:39, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Agree, it reads so biased and praises the model so much. Wikipedia is supposed to give an unbiased view on information. 45.248.50.50 (talk) 00:33, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- I think we should all just try make it unbiased and fix the tone DeadlyRampage26 (talk) 08:26, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Any article about military specs will feel like propaganda for some. 2001:448A:3010:1B66:F94C:592D:5C4C:34E2 (talk) 05:34, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- I think its more about the tone. It argues so much for how this model is superior to others rather than having neutral language and tone. DeadlyRampage26 (talk) 10:08, 20 April 2024 (UTC)