Talk:Kewaunee Power Station

Latest comment: 2 years ago by 47.32.63.153 in topic 3rd I think

Probably should be noted that the article referencing the water leak in April 2006 is no longer a valid link. Johnsorc 00:54, 5 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

4th? edit

This says fourth nuclear power plant, but I can only find two previous La Crosse Boiling Water Reactor and Point Beach Nuclear Generating Station. Maybe they meant 4th power reactor, as Point Beach has two units and since La Crosse had one that would make Kewaunee the 4th used for commercial electricity. I think this infor came from EIA, but the source doesn't make it clear what the previous 3 were. NRC only lists 3 plants, 4 reactors. --Dual Freq (talk) 01:52, 20 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kewaunee Power Station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:28, 5 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

3rd I think edit

I thought the same thing. Isn't there only 3? 47.32.63.153 (talk) 18:59, 25 January 2022 (UTC)Reply