| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Untitled edit
So I did an update recently, hope this better fits with what a Wikipedia article should look like.--Chris Latour (talk) 02:48, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
Hello,
I'm not sure what the formatting should be for the reference section. If someone could help with an update it would be appreciated.
Chris L. Hamilton, ON
Neutrality edit
The article should be improved to include all opinions of his work. The current version is very one sided as he showed to be very partisan... --Ntb613 (talk) 05:56, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
- I worked substantially on the article, integrating content from the external links, etc. I believe it now includes a number of different perspectives with related RS. I removed the "too few opinions" template that was placed there over five years ago. If anyone feels it still lacks sufficient viewpoints, the template can be added again.Oceanflynn (talk) 01:17, 20 November 2018 (UTC)