Talk:Ken Chan (Filipino actor)
Latest comment: 9 years ago by No such user in topic Requested move
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Requested move edit
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Moved to Ken Chan (Filipino actor). Unclear on the dab page name, but Kenneth Chan is currently good enough (NAC) No such user (talk) 11:14, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
Ken Chan → Ken Chan (Filipino actor) – Not primary topic: not more significant than actor Kenneth Chan Kai-tai or politician Kenneth Chan Ka-lok. The current title should redirect to Kenneth Chan dabpage. As for the "Filipino" thing, I was torn between Filipino and Filipino-Chinese, but I think "Filipino" is more concise than hyphenated phrase. I redirected Ken Chan (actor) to the dabpage. George Ho (talk) 06:25, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support good call. In ictu oculi (talk) 13:22, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Though, I think the dab page should be moved to Ken Chan after this article is moved off -- 67.70.35.44 (talk) 05:21, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
- You mean Kenneth Chan? --George Ho (talk) 07:04, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, Kenneth Chan should move to Ken Chan -- 67.70.35.44 (talk) 16:25, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
- There are two Kenneth Chans. I think making "Ken Chan" a redirect is fine enough. --George Ho (talk) 16:58, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
- I think "Ken" is more inclusive than "Kenneth" and would allow for future inclusions of anyone named "Kenny" more easily -- 67.70.35.44 (talk) 05:48, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
- There are two Kenneth Chans. I think making "Ken Chan" a redirect is fine enough. --George Ho (talk) 16:58, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, Kenneth Chan should move to Ken Chan -- 67.70.35.44 (talk) 16:25, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
- You mean Kenneth Chan? --George Ho (talk) 07:04, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.