Talk:Kelly's Directory
Latest comment: 2 years ago by TimSC in topic Kelly's Directory as a source
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
Proposed merge edit
Doesn't seem sensible to me - I'd rather see two article on what are two different things - someone researching Vivtoriana won't be help by a modern search article. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 04:46, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
Prod notice edit
I have removed this as the article documents an important historical record in the United Kingdom which is an important social and historical refence point. Brookie :) - he's in the building somewhere! (Whisper...) 16:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- You were right to take the tag off. When I flagged this article I had it confused with some of the non-notable Internet directories out there. The article does need some major cleanup. --StuffOfInterest 17:21, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Kelly's Directory as a source edit
Kelly's Directory out of copyright before a certain date? It might be useful as a source of material if it is.TimSC (talk) 21:54, 27 May 2021 (UTC)