Talk:Kelkoo Group

Copyright violation?

This article is probably a copyright violation from Kelkoo Corporate Information. -- MightyWarrior 14:07, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

I have now removed what was just blatant copying, and added citations where possible. I'm still improving this article, but feedback would be welcome :) Blowski 15:46, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Looks to me a bit like this has been written by the kelkoo marketing guys - no negative points, and overenthustic use of the word "enjoy", which I don't feel is very encyclopaedic - if anyone has the time check the edit history for dodgy anon edits.87.127.98.185 18:01, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

I've added several references from reliable sources to back up some of the claims. Seems more neutral than it used to be. RyanVisser (talk) 15:13, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

It's now 2017 and the article still reads like an ad.

Kelkoo has been in the news: Google fined €2.7bn for anti-trust | violation. Kelkoo one of the plaintiffs. 1812ahill (talk) 23:42, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

kell'k

^{Superscript text}

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Kelkoo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070701084008/http://docs.yahoo.com/docs/pr/release1160.html to http://docs.yahoo.com/docs/pr/release1160.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100329135628/http://www.kelkoo.co.uk/co_5203-how-to-use-kelkoo-frequently-asked-questions.html to http://www.kelkoo.co.uk/co_5203-how-to-use-kelkoo-frequently-asked-questions.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100811072836/http://www.smartshopper.com/Partners/OurPartners.aspx to http://smartshopper.com/Partners/OurPartners.aspx
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130405070342/http://thinking.grant-thornton.co.uk/emergingmarkets/index.php/article/kelkoos_bric_comparison_picks_out_brazil_for_growth to http://thinking.grant-thornton.co.uk/emergingmarkets/index.php/article/kelkoos_bric_comparison_picks_out_brazil_for_growth/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:08, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kelkoo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927221026/http://www.e-consultancy.com/news-blog/150160/kelkoo-seals-msn-deal.html to http://www.e-consultancy.com/news-blog/150160/kelkoo-seals-msn-deal.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:45, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

The 'See also' tab should be above the 'References' and 'External links' tabs

In my opinion, the 'See also' tab should be above the 'References' and 'External links' tabs instead of below them as it would help to maintain consistency within Wikipedia and in my opinion the 'See also' tab on this article looks strange in its current location. Xboxsponge15 (talk) 12:12, 28 July 2021 (UTC)