Talk:Keel

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Sailing Low‑importance

	Keel is within the scope of the WikiProject Sailing, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Sailing. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.SailingWikipedia:WikiProject SailingTemplate:WikiProject SailingSailing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion

added 'kelson' to the see also list

Kelson Philo 15:40, 22 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

Sort of seems like if you say something like "keel was the first written English word" you ought to back that up with a citation? I find this factoid highly suspect and I believe that without further citation/research it should be removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.204.72.207 (talk) 04:54, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

A quick search lends some credibility to the claim (see http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/gildas_02_ruin_of_britain.htm) but doesn't verify it, so I'll tag "citation needed" and keep looking. scot (talk) 15:45, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Found a verification in a book on Google Books. scot (talk) 15:59, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

I think the short introduction text needs improving, "these parts overlap" isn't clear at all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.182.121.221 (talk) 08:31, 17 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Add topic