Talk:Katie King (spirit)

	This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Title edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

It seems rather odd to have Katie King (spirit) as the title and Florence Cook as the redirect. Since Cook indisputably existed and there is a signficant literature about her, while King is discussed only as an emanation of Cook, it seems that Florence Cook is the appropriate subject of the article. Cusop Dingle (talk) 21:31, 1 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

The reason is that Katie appeared for others, too--not just Florence Cook (it's in the article).--Anthon.Eff (talk) 02:54, 3 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

I should have written "mainly" rather than "only". Cusop Dingle (talk) 07:34, 3 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Katie King (spirit). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090421201555/http://www.survivalafterdeath.org.uk/books/crookes/researches/notes.htm to http://www.survivalafterdeath.org.uk/books/crookes/researches/notes.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:29, 3 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

quality of the article compared to the french one edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

i am native french speaker , but regardless browse usually more english version of articles because in most cases it seems way more complete. this seems to be the only time i recall the english version being shorter than the french one, if u take of the equation every obvious case where the french version would be more complete (whatever french topic..).

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florence_Cook — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.51.20.36 (talk) 01:33, 3 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic