Talk:Kathryn Newton
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Opinions on infobox image edit
Since I'm sensing an edit war coming up, I replaced the current image of Kathryn Newton with a straightened, warmer version, as seen here. Not less than a day later, my edit is replaced with this version. Since I've made one revert and refuse to get into a war, I will leave it up to the good people here to decide which one is better. – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 19:52, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
Well, let's see the opinion of users, what is the best between these two images:
-
Current image
-
Headshot version With color correction
.jpg){kind=link}
We are awaiting a response, and thank you. --77.31.73.118 (talk) 21:32, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
There’s currently no picture if anyone would like to add one. Ashleighhhh (talk) 23:14, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
Propose for deletion edit
This is an unsourced biography and doesn't meet the Wikipedia Notability Guidelines. There is also no verifiable evidence in this article about a living person.
 |
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability#General_notability_guideline
 | This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past. |
Atlantic306 (talk) 17:54, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Kathryn Newton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6FaZ1wnUQ?url=http://www.youngartistawards.org/noms34.html to http://www.youngartistawards.org/noms34.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131012070515/http://www.youngartistawards.org/noms31.html to http://www.youngartistawards.org/noms31.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:22, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
- Hi , the problem was archived page versions were added that did not show the results which should be marked in red so I replaced with archive.is pages that do show the winners in red, thanks
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
.jpg){kind=link}
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:38, 9 July 2019 (UTC)