"Kate Ní Cnaimhín" edit

There's bit of an editor war going on with an IP who insists on the unsupported name "Kate Ní Cnaimhín". The sources used only give "Kate McNiven", "Kate Nevin" and "Kate M'Niven". The IP has created a cut-and-paste copy of this article at Kate Ní Cnaimhín and removed a 'citation needed' template. I'm not sure how to handle this if they aren't willing to listen.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 10:17, 21 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

The "Name" section contains a bunch of unrelated weblinks, none of which contain the English-Irish hybrid "Kate Ní Chnáimhín". You can't take unrelated weblinks and bundle them up together to form an original and unverifiable claim (see WP:SYNTHESIS). You can't take one link which says one thing, and another link which says something else, and then add them together to create an independent claim which neither of them made. The undo emphasis the article places on that name is striking. Also, the weblink in the "After Death" section does not support the claim that the "Graemes of Inchbrakie incorporated the 3 Cresent Moons of the Nevins into the Shield of their own Coat of Arms".--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 05:18, 22 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
It's reasonably plain (even to a Sassenach) that this form of the name sounds distinctly Irish. Also it's clear that while the Niven/Nevin forms are in wide use, the hybrid form is not. There is certainly no cause here for a cut-and-paste duplicate article - a redirect is more than sufficient. Chiswick Chap (talk) 06:47, 26 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
About the heraldry, the IP has added two refs, but neither of them seem to support the claim. Scottish Ghosts by Lily Seafield is previewable on GoogleBooks. I've searched for the following words without any hits: "Nevin", "McNevin", "Monzie", "coat of arms", "crescent". The other cited ref, The Holocaust, Or, The Witch of Monzie, is viewable here: [1]. I read the 'preliminary remarks' on Kate and could not find anything about heraldry. I didn't bother reading the author's poetry, but I searched the text for "crescent", "heraldry", "coat of arms" and didn't turn up anything about heraldry.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 06:54, 28 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Original Nevin Coat of Arms.jpg Nominated for Deletion edit

  An image used in this article, File:Original Nevin Coat of Arms.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Original Nevin Coat of Arms.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 07:18, 28 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Kate Nevin stone.jpg Nominated for Deletion edit

  An image used in this article, File:Kate Nevin stone.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Kate Nevin stone.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:53, 9 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kate McNiven. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:44, 7 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:21, 10 December 2018 (UTC)Reply