Talk:Kate Harper

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Explodicle in topic Redirect
WikiProject iconDisambiguation
WikiProject iconThis disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.

Untitled edit

I've not seen the 6th series as it hasn't been shown in the UK yet, but the actress playing Kate Harper would only have been 16 in 1985 which seems rather young to be enlisted into the CIA. Was she definitely recruited to the CIA in the mid 80s (presumably after some time in the navy)? Also How can she have worked covert operations for two decades or more if she has been the deputy NSA since 2003 but only joined the CIA in the mid 80s? Arthur Holland 12:33, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

The Show has her as much older as she doesn't look her age.
Uh, A) I think she does look her age, B) When have they EVER said her age on this show? Furthermore, when was it mentioned she was in the CIA as far back as the mid-1980's. I think this is false.
Another interesting fact is that women cannot serve on submarines in the USN. One can always argue that the West Wing universe is different, but more likely it is a pretty lame mistake, if actually true (I don't recall the episode that revealed this fact). Rlove 16:41, 5 April 2006 (UTC)Reply
When they said it, I took it to add to her mystery BECAUSE women can't serve on submarines--so what was she up to? While this may seem like fiction, try to remember that it is. --Brian 06:09, 8 December 2006. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.107.110.106 (talk) 14:17, 8 December 2006 (UTC).Reply

EU section edit

Where in the series does it say her book partially concerns the EU? 7.01 doesn't seem to give those details. EJB341 19:59, 18 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Redirect edit

Regarding this edit summary, whether or not the actress was credited or there are other (in your opinion) more trivial characters on Wikipedia is irrelevant. No sources, no article. --Explodicle (T/C) 13:19, 11 January 2010 (UTC)Reply