Talk:Karnataka Express

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: Passenger trains Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the Passenger trains task force.

More information:
/
	This article lacks references.
	It is requested that an a map be included in this article to improve its quality. Please work with the Maps task force to create and add a map to this article.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Karnataka Express. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140601030217/http://www.indianrail.gov.in/ to http://indianrail.gov.in/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:18, 2 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Recent edit warring edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

LeoFrank I think you're applying WP:NOTTRAVEL incorrectly. It reads: An article on Paris should mention landmarks, such as the Eiffel Tower and the Louvre, but not the telephone number or street address of the "best" restaurants, nor the current price of a café au lait on the Champs-Élysées. Wikipedia is not the place to recreate content more suited to entries in hotel or culinary guides, travelogues, and the like. The content you keep removing does not fall under this. Simply being about transport does not mean something violates NOTTRAVEL. As for your notability argument, WP:N discusses whether something should have its own article. It is not about whether something should be included on an existing page. NemesisAT (talk) 12:53, 10 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

NemesisAT, Your understanding is completely wrong of WP:NOTTRAVEL. How is the coach composition of a train, the locomotive used to haul the train, the average speed it traverses important? Coach composition is only for passengers who need to travel in the train. Locomotive and speed are for rail enthusiasts. So, it's basically a combination of WP:NOTTRAVEL and WP:FANSITE. — LeoFrank ^Talk 13:02, 10 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

A lot of people clearly do think route and locomotive information is important. Look at articles like Northern Trains. You are taking a subjective view here. Are station articles and rail route articles only for rail enthusiasts too? NemesisAT (talk) 13:07, 10 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic