Talk:Karlqvist gap

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Engineering Low‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Has I tried to explain the Karlqvist Gap is fundamental discovery and it also is explained in many books and as well as on the Internet.

The Karlqvist Gap teory is still up to date when designing magnetic heads, - if you have gap you have to calculate the gap. Therfore I think it is a value to have it also in Wikipedia. This not a PR for the person Olle Karlqvist it is only for the discovery. I have also done a small notice for Karlqvist Gap in the BESK history.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jkq tech (talk • contribs)

Accessible sources edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article only has three sources, and they're all in Swedish. Can someone find some sources in English? --JDspeeder1 (talk) 06:01, 17 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Better layman's explanation edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article explains why the Karlqvist gap is important, but it doesn't actually explain what it is. It seems to suggest that it's a newer, simpler method of solving a complicated math problem, but why is that referred to as a "gap"? --JDspeeder1 (talk) 06:28, 17 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic