This article was nominated for deletion on 25 November 2018. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article was created or improved during the #1day1woman initiative hosted by the Women in Red project in 2018. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to University of California, its history, accomplishments and other topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject University of CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject University of CaliforniaUniversity of California articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
@Roosevelt111: Do you have a conflict of interest with Karla Jurvetson? The material you've added over the past few months seems highly promotional to me. In addition, raw external weblinks in the text body is something frowned upon by Wikipedia. Even if the links were changed to references, many of these appear to be highly primary sources - things like Standford's website having a single sentence call out to her as a donor just isn't independent or significant. If Jurvetson's donation was significant, let's see a WP:SECONDARY source, i.e. a newspaper article or the like, and a substantial one. For example, https://www.politico.com/news/2020/03/20/mystery-warren-super-pac-funder-revealed-140233 is fine, but the party itself being donated to is not. SnowFire (talk) 22:03, 8 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments1 person in discussion
@SF Public Editor: I hope my edit summary wasn't too antagonistic, but I think this issue has come up before on this article, and apparently the hint hasn't been taken from edit summaries and the like. Sourcing on Wikipedia is tricky sometimes. In general, for a biography article like this, we really really really want sources that cover Jurvetson specifically and mention her actions by name. The tone of the article previously was having Jurvetson "take credit" for far too much; one donor, no matter how extravagant, can win an election solo. You can imagine a fabulist who just cited a lot of political articles describing real events and real elections, and then implying that SnowFire or SF Public Editor or whoever else was responsible for all of it. It's okay to use sources that don't mention the topic (Jurvetson in this case) by name sometimes, for basic background material, but it can't be used to prop up claims of importance or relevance.
And even when Jurvetson is mentioned, we have to take the source into account. It's great we have some in-depth stories from Puck (media company), but put bluntly, they don't appear quite as prestigious as mainstream news like The Washington Post or the like. So we have to be careful about what kind of claims we use - Jurvetson's beliefs and basic actions, sure. But stuff like "the most impactful donor?" Probably not. We'd need a really good source to include a claim like that, and even then, it'd probably be qualified as who's saying it.
Lastly, circular references to other Wikipedia articles are super-forbidden. That said, if there's sources within Jared Tinklenberg that support the claims in the early life bio here, then those can be ported over directly, just not a cite of the Wikipedia article itself. SnowFire (talk) 23:08, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
@SF Public Editor: If you're just going to remove "better source needed" without replacing it, then I'm going to rephrase the section to enforce source-text integrity. I presume you don't want that, so that means finding an actually good source that verifies the full statement.
Also, thanks for adding a cite on the Wisconsin Supreme Court case, but that makes me wonder if it's worth mentioning at all. 20K as a donation is a drop in the bucket for someone of Jurvetson's wealth - wealthy donors routinely donate far more than that to various causes, it's not generally notable.
I don't understand your preferred way of phrasing Jurvetson not supporting Sinema. It's not a secret, Sinema left the Democratic Party, it's okay to acknowledge that fact out loud. There's no shame in Jurvetson being a Democrat, just don't dress it up as if she's a non-partisan influencer solely donating on the issues, her stance is pretty well-known and attested to. SnowFire (talk) 23:25, 17 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
