Talk:Kantha
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Highpeaks35 in topic Indian subcontinent vs. South Asia
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kantha article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Indian subcontinent vs. South Asia edit
@Rh7hd: please explain yourself. Kantha is related to the cultures of modern India and Bangladesh mainly, which are both part of the Indian subcontinent. South Asia reflective of a broader term that brings Tibet, Iran and Afghanistan. How are these cultures related to this article? All point to Indian subcontinent being most accurate and concise. (Highpeaks35 (talk) 11:35, 21 September 2018 (UTC))
- Highpeaks35 As per your logic, indian subcontinent contains Nepal, Bhutan, Pakistan too. Then 'How are these cultures related to this article?'
- Bro, it is not about SA or IS. Bengal lies on both. It's about which term global readers would understand more. A major proportion of the global population don't know where India is, forget about Indian subcontinent. But they know where Asia, thus South Asia is. So they can easily locate the location of Bengal. God knows why you brain doesn't getting this simple thing. Still for your satisfaction, I am putting the both. Kindly don't revert it any more. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rh7hd (talk • contribs) 04:05, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- I disagree with your point of view. However, I completely agree with the current version. It is neutral and clear. This version of your lead stays. (Highpeaks35 (talk) 10:26, 22 September 2018 (UTC))