Talk:Kagney Linn Karter

Latest comment: 1 month ago by Sangdeboeuf in topic Karter's real name and WP:TWITTER

PornstarGlobal 5 Star Award edit

I ask that the last edits made please be undone. I may also have to ask the assistance of other editors for oversight and dispute resolution as it appears PornstarGlobal.com 5 Star Awards are not being recognized for some reason. I can verify first hand that although relatively new, it is in fact a recognized Online Award. Viewers vote, a Winner is chosen, Prize is awarded. This Online Award has more Sponsors than some of the 'trophy' awards I have seen & been to. Solidcontrib (talk) 20:45, 1 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

At this point, no. Notability has not been established for the award, and given that it's an online award you're probably going to have a hard case arguing it is... Tabercil (talk) 17:37, 4 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Well, I definately don't want to argue with anyone about anything. I did find it odd that the PornstarGlobal 5 Star Awards have been recognized and visible on Sunny Leone's page since December of 2010, but when I added the same info to Kagney's page, both were removed 1 minute apart from eachother, instantly. As shown here: Award "An award may also simply be a public acknowledgment of excellence, without any tangible token or prize." Am I missing something? Solidcontrib (talk) 23:35, 4 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

FYI, pornstarglobal is blacklisted from wikipedia from past spamming issues. See [1][2]. Morbidthoughts (talk) 23:19, 4 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Ah, this I did not know, which is why I couldn't just link to their site straight away I'm assuming. At the risk of sounding nip-picky though, I still think we should recognize the Award aspect as it is a valid Award no matter which way you look at it as per: Award. If this is personal, I can understand that as well, but don't think it serves the concept of Wikipedia. Solidcontrib (talk) 23:34, 4 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Whether it's welcome or not, it is still an Award no matter how you cut it. I am now somewhat confused about the actual objective here. Is it about accuracy where deserved, or welcome mats? No disrespect. Also, have they vandalized since 2009?

Karter's real name and WP:TWITTER edit

Kagney recently updated her Twitter account to reflect her last name. According to WP:SELFPUB, it's a valid source since it's her own personal account. Also adding her name doesn't violate exceptions 2 and 3, it's established that @KagneyTweets is her twitter handle, and the article isn't based on her Twitter account. --wL<speak·check> 04:27, 16 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Neither cited source states that her birth name is "Necessary"; a Twitter affectation is not a name. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 11:08, 16 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

According to the Texas Birth Index, 1905-1997, her birth surname is Necessary. I would attach a scan of the page where her birth is recorded in that index, but I don't know how. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.54.47.138 (talk) 20:07, 4 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Public records are not suitable sources for a biography of a living (or recently deceased) person. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 23:09, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply