 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
Untitled edit
Please delete - new article that does not in any way infringe on copyrights has been uploaded to the /temp page.
I was not aware that there was an issue with the original copyright holder, until i saw the note in his entry on the cryptography project page.
Roidhun 15:05, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks; I've moved it to the main page, and deleted the old one. We could do with rewording it to avoid some of the military jargon, though, so that mere mortals can understand it :) — Matt Crypto 17:59, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
Clarification edit
Done a bit, but will be glad if somebody else will take a look ;) Roidhun 04:45, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
- seems to make sense, lots of links, what's the problem? Chrismorey (talk) 08:34, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
Wayne Madsen report edit
I moved the external link pointing to "The Wayne Madsen Report" site here. The link is * The demise of global communications security (contains the story of the KY-78 compromise) here. After reading the link, I am unsure that it is credible. It's an essay that makes a number of strong claims, but does not support them or provide links. It doesn't feel like a good candidate for an external link for an encyclopedia article. I've moved it here to start a discussion. I'd like to hear what others think. --Zippy 09:14, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
Military Jargon -> English edit
I cleaned up some of the military jargon, and re-worked alot of the grammatical structure. Can someone review it for clarity, to see if the Confusing|date=December 2006 marking can be removed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 214.13.47.111 (talk) 09:05, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
- What does TSEC mean? 70.251.33.92 (talk) 17:43, 2 January 2009 (UTC)