Talk:K-30 (Kansas highway)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Racepacket (talk) 14:48, 4 April 2011 (UTC) I am looking forward to working with you and hope that we can expedite completion of this review. Thanks. GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

Thank you for nominating this article. No disamb. or invalid external links.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A (prose):

   Prose was concise and to the point.

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   The David Rumsey map collection is a very nice historical tool. Should footnote 9 include its name as well as the name of the underlying map?

   Sure, but I have no idea how.— PCB 15:59, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

   I have added it. If there is a better way, someone can always improve it. Racepacket (talk) 16:24, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

   Thanks. — PCB 16:29, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

   Is Kansas Highways Routelog a reliable source? Is it the source of your statements that K-30 was paved in 1953? (From the map alone, you can only say "by 1953.")

   I added the 1952 map so "in 1953" would work. No it is not a reliable source.— PCB 15:59, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   Article is appropriate for the subject.

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

   No edit wars.

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   This article represents significant work by its author, and only minor suggestion about sourcing and a possible RS question were raised. Putting review on hold for you to address concerns. Racepacket (talk) 15:28, 4 April 2011 (UTC)