Talk:Justin W. Brierly

Latest comment: 2 years ago by 2601:246:C700:558:788E:57D2:61D2:FF5D in topic Category issue

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Justin W. Brierly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:37, 29 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Category issue edit

The categories for this article are clear with regard to this subject's LGBT associations. However, the article is circumspect on the topic, nowhere clearly making the case, and some citations appearing where the matter is most addressed—hidden in footnotes—are either deadlinks, or are otherwise untraceable/unconfirmable.

If categories appear, the article should clearly make the case for the category, based on traceable citations. Absent support with traceable citations, the category should not appear. (In future, add categories only if the article makes a clear case, based on citations!)

I will remove one category, not to be provocative, but to draw attention to the need for attention to the category and the text that supports. 2601:246:C700:558:E5B3:34B6:DF93:960 (talk) 19:44, 21 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Citations were found and added that established his DOB, DOD, places of education, and that he had a law proactice. So, in the edit summaries, the statement made that his practicing as a lawyer was yet unsubstantiated can be ignored. However, the categories stating his LGBT associations are as yet still poorly sourced (either by dead links, or by urls that are not amenable to this editor's verification. Rest of cleanup is therefore up to someone else. 2601:246:C700:558:788E:57D2:61D2:FF5D (talk) 01:18, 22 November 2021 (UTC)Reply